Sports

Anthony Mantha’s profile shows why Rangers fit debate is complicated

Anthony Mantha’s mix of size, speed and scoring inconsistency is being weighed as free-agent forward talk turns to Rangers fit.

Joe's Reaction of the Week (Chip's Version): The Search for the Next Anthony Mantha
Joe's Reaction of the Week (Chip's Version): The Search for the Next Anthony Mantha

’s name is back in the conversation for reasons that go beyond his box score. The 6-foot-5, 240-pound forward played 81 games this season, only the second time in his 11-year NHL career he got to 80 or more, and only the third time he cleared 70.

That durability matters because Mantha has long been easier to admire than to project. Drafted 20th overall by the in 2013, he has never reached 25 goals in a season and had topped 20 goals only four times in the 10 seasons before this year. The surface numbers leave you wanting more — much more — but they do not tell the whole story. He has a heavy shot that ranks among the best in the NHL, he is a very good possession player and he has good speed. What he was never known as, though, was a player who could regularly create his own chances.

That mix is exactly why free-agent comparisons to Mantha are being used to sort through possible Rangers fits. A player with his frame should look like a power forward, but Mantha has never been a truly physically imposing presence despite the size that jumps off the page. His career has been built on strong underlying traits and interrupted by inconsistent scoring and injury issues, which makes the question less about what he looks like and more about what he actually delivers when the season starts.

There is also a name that can lead people down the wrong path. Mantha is not related to , the former fourth-round pick, even if the surname is uncommon and the builds are similar. In this case, the comparison is about style and usage, not family ties. For teams weighing short-term help on the wing, that distinction matters because Mantha’s value has always lived in the gap between what his tools suggest and what his numbers have usually shown.

This year complicates the old scouting report. If 81 games says he can stay available, the rest of the record says the scoring has to be taken with caution. The next team has to decide whether the shot, speed and possession game are enough to bet on, or whether the history points to the safer conclusion: a useful forward, but not one who ever fully matched the size of his reputation.

Share this article Tweet Facebook